|
The New Electric Navy
By Scott Clay, Bishop & Associates Inc.
With the acceptance
of the new budget and the Quadrennial Defense Review projections for
2011 and beyond, the Navy has set its plans for new ship construction,
new materials for their ships, and established pricing benchmarks for
new platforms. This is a major change for the service. Another change is
the expansion of electricity in all areas of these new ships.
New submarines will be partially built of composites, shipbuilding
contracts will be at set costs, and systems that used to be hydraulic or
mechanical will now be electric. New intelligence and communication
networks are being installed on all the ships. The new fleet carriers
will have electro-magnetic catapult systems for launching aircraft,
replacing the older steam-powered mechanisms that have served for almost
50 years. Orders are being placed for new F-18G electronic warning
aircraft, and upgrades to the remaining EA-6B Prowlers, to keep them in
service for another five to seven years. Unmanned aircraft will be built
and deployed, as well as the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Navy version,
with larger landing gear, larger wings, and longer range. Even new
technology weapons such as directed energy and other kinetic laser-type
weapons will be installed in the new DDG-1000 and other aircraft, to act
as anti-missile and anti-aircraft weapons.
Ship propulsion also will move towards more nuclear powered systems,
with less reliance on oil-based products. There will also be a refocus
on shallow water or “littoral” operations, with more riverine and
shoreline patrol and incursion from shipboard. The Navy has also further
developed a land-air-sea concept to defeat adversaries, no matter where
they are located. All this involves even more electronics, and of
course, connectors. The concept will also access cyberspace, and means
the use of even more computers in all areas, involving new systems
protection, EMI protection, and increased electrical power. There is a
request from the administration to review alternative fuels for the
Navy’s use, but it appears nuclear power, in long-term use for both
carriers and submarines, will be the choice for many of the new ships,
including a proposed new frigate, which will be key in fleet defense.

Another key to the
Navy’s plans is future ship construction based on fixed prices and total
costs. The experience in the past, especially for the Littoral Combat
Ships, has been serious cost overruns, and Congress has called the Navy
to task on this for future ships. Now costs will be closely monitored,
with active targets for the vessels and their systems, especially
electrical and electronic, which often can be a major part of cost
increases.
In the simulator above, note the use of displays, new controls, and
computers. Gone is the old-fashioned “wheel” or steering gear. Now, a
modern electronic control “stick” maneuvers and steers the ship. With
this type of control bridge, the use of wire and electronics is more
than doubling in new ship construction.
This new type of “electronic bridge” is becoming standard for the
DDG-1000, the Littoral Combat Ship, the new Coast Guard cutter, and
other ships of the fleet. This growth of electronics extends into the
power plants, the command and control centers, the new radar and
surveillance systems, and newest countermeasures of various types, for
shipboard protection against all types of threats. Also, the expanded
power needs for all these systems means more and more wire and heavy
duty connectors are needed to run this power to all of these stations
within the ship. A modern Nimitz class carrier contains over 800 miles
of wire and cable. While this ship is over 1,000 feet long, this same
type of ratio applies to smaller ships. Shipyards are becoming cable and
wiring specialists. This type of work used to be outsourced, but the
major shipbuilders now find it more cost-effective to handle the work
themselves. Yards such as the Newport News Shipbuilding in Virginia has
an entire division that deals with electrical portions of the huge
Nimitz class carriers that are built and refurbished at this huge navy
construction yard. They are currently completing the George H. W. Bush
for service, and have starting laying the keel of the new Gerald R. Ford
Class (CVN 78), the newest version of the Nimitz Class ship. The Ford is
due to join the fleet by 2015, and it is entirely possible that there
will only be nine carrier groups by 2012, as there is great pressure
within the Navy and Congress to retire the Enterprise, the first nuclear
carrier developed years ago for the fleet. While it continues in
service, it is more expensive and needs more service than the newer
Nimitz class ships.

The George H. W. Bush
(CVN 77) is under construction at the Newport News Shipyard near
Norfolk, Virginia. The ship is over 1,000 feet long, and the yard has
two especially large docks for servicing and building these ships. There
are no other yards in the U. S. large enough to handle the construction
of these ships. To the north of this ship, in the adjacent dock, the
keel of the Gerald R. Ford, the newest version of fleet carriers is
being laid. The Ford is even more revolutionary than the Bush, with even
more electric systems and innovations, including moving the entire
control tower and command central farther toward the stern of the ship,
giving it even more usable deck space than the 4.5 acres on a normal
Nimitz ship.
This yard is where the other Nimitz class ships are docked for their
service and overhauls. Most of these ships are cycled in for service
every three to five years, and the service can take a year or more,
depending on what needs to be upgraded or changed. The Theodore
Roosevelt, another Nimitz class carrier, is currently undergoing an
upgrade that began in 2009, and the project cost is almost $4 billion.
Due to the complexity and huge size of these ships, it takes up to five
years to build a Nimitz class ship, and the projected cost of the Ford
is over $11 billion dollars. So while the numbers of ships being built
is small, the costs and content for electronics, wiring, and connectors
is very large. These ships are budgeted and planned so far ahead of time
that they are rarely cancelled or cut, ensuring that the components
needed for them can be assured in build and planning.
Component and connector makers can plan production and volumes based on
Navy shipbuilding plans, and there are scores of other connectors that
go into the hundreds of computers, displays, electronic systems, and
other systems onboard.
Scott Clay
Director Military & Aerospace, Bishop & Associates Inc.
Scott Clay has worked for more than 25 years in the connector
and wiring systems markets. He has held various positions in
field applications and marketing for Molex, Tyco, Methode, and
ITT. For the past 15 years, Clay has focused on the
military/aerospace sector, and five years ago formed his own
company for consulting and application engineering. He has
worked on design-in and electronics on F/A-18E/F, F-22, F-35,
C-130J, C-5M, C-27, P-8, A-10, and numerous other aircraft. Some
of the Navy programs Clay has participated in are SSN-774
Virginia class subs, CVX, DDG-1000, and the Littoral Combat Ship
class. He has extensive expertise in land vehicle systems, and
has worked closely with the worldwide locations of GD, BAE, AM
General, and other key manufacturers. He is currently working on
variations of MRAP, JLTV, upgrades for the Bradley fighting
vehicle, M-88 recovery vehicle, FMTV, and other platforms in the
wiring and systems areas, plus portions of the future combat
systems. |