|
An Air
vs. Army Product Show Comparison
By Scott Clay.
Bishop & Associates Inc.
I attended both of
these recent military product show and I thought a personal comparison
of the two might be interesting to CS.com readers who were unable to
attend.
The National Business Aircraft Association Show (NBAA) is very large,
occupying most of the North Hall at the Orlando (Florida) Convention
Center. There are large displays of aircraft, helicopters, suppliers,
and companies that operate within this market. One difference this year
is that the daily show paper, distributed to attendees upon arrival, did
not mention or display any news about “large orders” or “major
commitments” for the major players in business aircraft. There was very
little news from Boeing, Airbus, Gulfstream, Raytheon, Cessna, or other
big names in the business aircraft sector. It has been my experience in
the past that these publications are full of this kind of news.
Talking with many of the attendees, I found that current conditions in
this market certainly seem to reflect the state of the economy. Orders
for new airplanes and helicopters are off significantly. The Very Light
Jet market that just a year ago was the darling of the industry shows
major signs of dissolving into a very small segment. Several makers have
gone out of business, and a main customer of Eclipse Aviation, which
planned to make a major play for the “air taxi” market in the Southeast
U.S., has closed its doors.
While many of the business development and sales groups at the major
booths were trying to be upbeat and positive, it was apparent that the
stock market decline has added to a very “down” market, and that there
was little news or feeling that new orders were forthcoming. However,
the segment of the industry that involves rebuilding, refurbishing, and
upgrading current aircraft and avionics was very busy. Rather than
spending large amounts on new platforms, it appears that companies see
the wisdom of spending less money and they are investing in maintaining
their existing fleets.
Another trend is that many companies are also touting their aircraft and
rotorcraft for Homeland Security and law enforcement roles. They still
see this as a market that has federal dollars available. Aircraft makers
offer various options for their planes that can be used for patrol,
surveillance, freight and cargo, and other missions.
The helicopter segment also seems to be stronger than general business
aircraft. This may be because these companies have experienced
growth—even in recent tight financial times—as the Federal Government
doles out over $32 billion per year for Homeland Security. Attendance
was good at NBAA, but the mood seemed even m ore
subdued as the week went on and the stock market plunge continued.
The
Association of the United States Army (AUSA) meeting in Washington, D.C.
had record breaking attendance. All of the booth space was taken in the
D.C. Convention Center, and there were over 400 exhibitors. The AUSA
Winter meeting in February has already sold out, and as has the 2009
October Annual meeting. Large crowds, vast displays, and a large
contingent of foreign military equipment makers were in attendance. It
is obvious with just some cursory reading and discussion that Europe
especially has made major cuts in defense spending and programs, and
they see the opportunities will be in the U. S., no matter what the Wall
Street situation is.
In my discussions and talks, there were no negative feelings expressed,
nor even a major concern of “how is the market doing today?” The topic
at this show is the products, the new ideas and technologies, the
improved vehicles and systems, and the outlook for this year and the
next several to come is positive. “How many do they think they will
buy?” seemed to be the biggest question. Most seem to feel that even
with some cuts in defense, this market sector is still going to have
growth and at least a steady business level this year and for the years
to come.
Booth activity at the show was very brisk. As mentioned, this year set a
record with over 30,000 registered attendees. Every major U. S. defense
company had a large display, with in some cases dozens of their people
on duty to answer questions, make presentations, discuss potentials, and
meet the many interested civilian and military people from all over the
world. As with NBAA, many of these vendors also were showing their
products in a “Homeland Security” venue, such as the UAV makers, robot
vehicle makers, small arms and sighting people (non-lethal systems were
especially popular), and even heavy vehicle makers offering disaster
relief and aid versions. The focus of this show has gone well beyond the
Army alone, and the people in attendance saw the latest in
communications, surveillance equipment, and weaponry of all types. As
the week passed, there seemed to be a marked contrast between the two
shows.
Spending a few days immersed in these shows only reinforced my
impression that the military sector will continue to be a good market
for connector manufacturers. The trick is to create products that
support both the companies that are ready to innovate and the ones that
want to upgrade or maintain their existing equipment.
Scott Clay
Director Military & Aerospace, Bishop & Associates Inc.
Scott Clay has worked for more than 25 years in the connector
and wiring systems markets. He has held various positions in
field applications and marketing for Molex, Tyco, Methode, and
ITT. For the past 15 years, Clay has focused on the
military/aerospace sector, and five years ago formed his own
company for consulting and application engineering. He has
worked on design-in and electronics on F/A-18E/F, F-22, F-35,
C-130J, C-5M, C-27, P-8, A-10, and numerous other aircraft. Some
of the Navy programs Clay has participated in are SSN-774
Virginia class subs, CVX, DDG-1000, and the Littoral Combat Ship
class. He has extensive expertise in land vehicle systems, and
has worked closely with the worldwide locations of GD, BAE, AM
General, and other key manufacturers. He is currently working on
variations of MRAP, JLTV, upgrades for the Bradley fighting
vehicle, M-88 recovery vehicle, FMTV, and other platforms in the
wiring and systems areas, plus portions of the future combat
systems. |