|
PCB Design and
Material Selection Drive High-Speed Performance
By Bob Hult,
Bishop & Associates Inc.
Like any successful
marriage, a well-designed high-speed channel is the result of a
series of carefully considered compromises made to achieve a
reasonable balance between potentially conflicting factors.
Design engineers often must find ways to bring what appear to be
incompatible requirements together in order to satisfy overall
system goals.
For instance, system packaging density and clock frequencies are
continuing to increase, forcing engineers to design high-speed
circuits in closer proximity, increasing the potential for
crosstalk. Smaller PCB trace widths allow more circuits per
layer, but direct current and skin effect losses limit the
ability to reduce their size. High-performance devices demand
more power, increasing the challenge to deliver higher current
and maintain junction temperatures below critical levels.
Backplane-based systems present a series of challenges that must
be addressed at each stage of the layout, fabrication, and
assembly process in order to achieve specified performance. The
design of the board and choice of PCB materials are two very
basic areas that will have a huge influence on the ultimate
success or failure of the product.
The
performance of a typical high-speed channel is influenced by
every element in the circuit path, including the driver
connection and trace characteristics on the daughtercard, the
connection to the backplane, the length and characteristics of
the multilayer backplane traces, the connection to the second
daughtercard, possibly a mezzanine connection, and finally, to
the pins on the receiver chip.
Each new project is rarely launched with a clean sheet. The
circuit designer often begins with a set of limitations,
including experience, available materials, test equipment, and
simulation software tools. Restraints established by the
internal or contract manufacturing location can immediately
narrow the available options.
The ability to maintain consistent impedance control throughout
the channel has always been important to maximize the amplitude
of the delivered signal and minimize reflections, but as
frequencies reach upwards of more than 5 Gb/s, the tolerance for
impedance discontinuities in a transmission line decrease. This
requires careful control of design and manufacturing tolerances
of line widths and spaces, PCB material thickness, as well as
the choice of connector. Recent efforts to introduce
differential circuits based on 85Ω rather than traditional 100Ω
adds a new wrinkle.
Adoption
of high-speed serial signaling has made the use of differential
signaling very attractive. Rather than use a single line
referenced to a common ground, differential signaling uses a
pair of lines. The voltage difference measured between the pair
determines the one or zero state.
Beyond improved high-speed performance, differential pair
signaling offers a degree of resistance to radiated
electromagnetic interference (EMI). External noise is impressed
on both sides of the pair. Since signal levels are measured as
the difference between the two lines, the effect of EMI is
effectively cancelled.
Another consideration is choosing between microstrip or
stripline routing. Microstrip, with its use of air dielectric,
offers lower attenuation, tighter coupling, and enables the use
of thinner dielectrics, but it limits circuits to the top layer.
Stripline is used in multilayer PCBs and offers greater density
and reduced far-end noise. Most systems use a combination of
both techniques.

The
relationship between differential pairs in the PCB and
connectors creates another decision point. Circuits can be
either edge-coupled or broadside-coupled. Each option has its
advantages and disadvantages, as well as a cadre of designers
who favor its use.

Material properties
that had little influence on circuit performance at low speed
can become significant at gigahertz frequencies. Signal
propagation tends to move from the interior toward the surface
of a conductor as speeds increase. White papers written over the
past few years have discussed how the surface roughness of PCB
traces can cause attenuation of the signal due to skin effect.
The degree of surface roughness of copper laminates is now a
defined part of the material specification.
Three of the most critical areas of concern designers face in
laying out a new channel include crosstalk, attenuation, and
timing.
Crosstalk is the result of unwanted coupling between adjacent
PCB traces or unshielded wire, and is a major source of signal
distortion. Crosstalk comes in two flavors, forward and
backward, both of which increase with the length of traces that
are parallel with each other.

Attenuation of
the signal comes from a variety of parameters, including the
size and length of the conductors, reflections, and skin effect.
Timing is a critical aspect of a high-speed system. Signals must
be synchronized to arrive at their destination at the right
time, often a window of only a few picoseconds in length. To do
this, the length of the physical circuit must be precisely
controlled. Failure to compensate for signal path length
variations results in signal skew and system havoc. Other
factors, such as an interaction among pulses and EMI, can delay
a portion of a high-speed signal, which results in a condition
known as jitter. Excessive jitter degrades the ability of the
receiver to discriminate the incoming signal.
A via provides a way to electrically connect circuits in
multi-layer boards. The plated through hole (PTH) adds the
ability to attach leaded devices to the board. But both have
been identified as significant contributors to signal
degradation.
A traditional PTH results in a vertical plated column that
extends from the surface of the PCB to the bottom. Selected
internal signal, or power layers, are connected to this column
to compete the circuit. At lower speeds, this arrangement works
well, but at higher speeds, transmission line effects create a
“stub” below the lowest point of internal contact. The portion
of the PTH below that point will generate reflections that can
cause serious signal distortion. Several approaches have been
used to minimize this problem.


Most board shops today drill out the unnecessary barrel from the
underside of the board. Controlled depth drilling, or
backdrilling, adds some cost, but is widely available.
Designers have
found that reducing the diameter of the PTH can minimize the
capacitive effect of these structures. The result has been a
continuing trend of reducing the diameter of the hole from
0.6mm, for standard 2mm HM connectors, to 0.46mm for the
Amphenol TCS GbX connector, to 0.41mm for the Molex Impact
connector. Tyco Electronics recently introduced its Micro Action
Pin, which is designed for a finished hole of only 0.22mm.
Amphenol
TCS has introduced an alternate approach with a dual diameter
design that uses a larger barrel for termination to the
connector and a smaller barrel below that point.
Small diameter holes in thick PCBs are more difficult to drill
and plate, add cost, and may limit the number of board
manufacturers that can be qualified to work with the product.
Noise generated by via stubs can be greatly reduced by the use
of blind and buried vias that start and end at their signal
level connection points, but the extra cost associated with this
technology has limited its use.
The footprint
of a connector designed for high-speed circuits has been found
to be a greater source of signal distortion than the connector
itself. Connector manufacturers have modified the design of the
launch to mitigate these effects. In some cases, differential
pairs are offset or separated by ground lines. Others offer a
suggested antipad design to minimize noise.


Another
solution is to eliminate the PTH and attach connectors using
surface mount technology. The large plated barrel is replaced
with a surface pad and a small via for connection to internal
layers.
High-speed PCB headers featuring ball grid array attachment have
been introduced by ERNI and FCI.

Several other suppliers, including Molex and SAMTEC, now offer
surface mount connectors that feature slugs of solder
mechanically clinched to the connector tails. Connectors are
placed on the surface of the circuit board and hot air reflow
soldered.

The choice of PCB laminate material has a profound influence on
the high-speed performance of a circuit. Modern PCB boards may
consist of up to 60 layers of dielectric materials and copper
foil sheets.
Traditional epoxy/glass FR-4 material has experienced a
continual migration to higher performance with improved
characteristics, including lower dielectric constant (Dk) and
dissipation factors (Df).
Newer materials specifically developed to support microwave
frequencies have entered the market. Along with higher
performance levels, they bring signficant cost premiums.

These newer
materials are designed specifically to support faster signal
speeds. Their higher cost can often be balanced with their
ability to maintain close impedance control using thinner
dielectrics that result in higher packaging density. Thinner
boards have shorter vias and plated through holes minimizing
distortion. High-layer-count boards experience serious
challenges in hole aspect ratios, as well as soldering problems.
Using higher performance laminiates can reduce the effects of
these issues. Longer traces can be designed, use less power, and
contribute to improved signal integrity of the system.
Achieving electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) objectives is
another critical aspect of the design process. The FCC and
global standards groups take a dim view of electronic equipment
that generate excessive emissions or are suseptible to damage in
expected noisy operating environments. Emissions generated by
high-speed circuits must be addressed with a variety of design
options, including additional ground layers in the board, local
shielding structures, the use of decoupling capacitors, filters
on input/output lines, as well as shielded chassis and cables.
These solutions consume PCB space, increase component part
counts, increase complexity, and add cost.
The ultimate goal of all PCB designs is the abiliy to reliably
deliver a recognizeable signal to its intended receiver. A wide
open-eye pattern gives assurance to the designer that the
equipment will function reliability.

The ability to
achieve these goals, given all of the variables of EMI,
environmental extremes, material and manufacturing tolearance
variations, in addition to human error, is a real
accomplishment, especially as system clock speeds approach 10 Gb/s
and beyond.
Bishop & Associates Comments
-
As channel speeds
increase into the multi-gigabit range, circuit design and
proper selection of materials becomes critical for success.
-
Circuit engineers
must often balance opposing objectives to manufacture a
cost-effective and high performing solution.
-
Physical
properties of materials that had little effect on
performance at lower speeds, can become signficantly at
multi-gigabit speeds.
-
Recently
introduced design and simulation tools can provide a quick
“what if?” analysis to determine the best trade-offs between
mulltiple design alternatives.
-
Designing PCBs
that satisfy mulltiple constraints may require more hand
routing of the board, adding cost and delay to the
development cycle.
-
New environmental
regulations regarding material choices and recycleability
put additional constraints on how electronic equipment is
designed and manufactured.
The design of
next-generation equipment will require even more compromise, as
system speeds continue to increase.
Robert
Hult Director of Product Technology, Bishop & Associates Inc. Robert Hult has been in the connector industry for more than 36
years. Hult began his career as a sales engineer for Amphenol.
He joined AMP in 1972 and served in several management positions
through 1996. In 1997, Hult joined Foxconn as group marketing
manager for Intel in Chandler, Arizona, U.S. Prior to joining
Bishop & Associates, Hult was the regional application
engineering manager for Tyco Electronics.
Hult graduated in 1968 from Bradley University with a bachelor
of science degree in electronics technology and a minor in
business. |