|
Who’s Got Your Back?
Choose a connector that can stand up to the highest demands
By Lynda Nolen, Bishop & Associates Inc.
History is filled
with instances in which chemical and biological agents were used to
injure or kill people. Early writings tell of not only individuals who
were assassinated with the use of a chemical or biological agent, but
also how entire civilizations, towns, and armies were incapacitated or
destroyed. Although numerous attempts were made to prohibit the use of
chemical or biological agents in warfare, including the Geneva Protocol
of 1925, with no means to control their development, most of these
attempts failed. Instead, over the last century, as civilization has
advanced, so has the development of biological, chemical, and now
nuclear and radioactive agents.
These agents can be used to sustain a civilization, as in the
development of nuclear power plants, refineries, and immunizations, or
as a way to harm or destroy a civilization—as in the development of
weapons of mass destruction. Handled properly and in a regulated
environment, these agents can be of extreme benefit to mankind, but
unregulated and placed in the hands of the wrong people, the damage can
be widespread and devastating.
As CBNR (chemical, biological, nuclear, and radioactive) agents have
proliferated, companies manufacturing equipment focused on sensing and
detecting a breech or attack, as well as neutralizing and
decontaminating an area and personnel have also developed. These global
companies use a variety of methods to detect or sense the presence of
CBNR agents, as well as neutralize or contain them until a course of
action can be determined. The equipment can be large enough to protect
an entire area or region, or small and portable enough to protect an
individual or small group.
The
most prevalent method of detection is linked to the use of some type of
sensor. The key to these sensors is their ability to discern a range of
agents, and to classify and identify the type of agent. For chemical
agents, a popular form of sensing is linked to the use of ion mobility
spectrometry. Similar to mass spectrometry, ion mobility spectrometry
senses the presence or absence of a chemical by colliding the ions of
the chemical with neutral gas molecules and passing them through a
collector that generates an electrical current to be measured. This
method allows for quick, accurate, and continual monitoring of airborne
chemicals. Another popular form of sensing uses Fourier Transform
Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). Similar to the way an individual can be
identified by their fingerprints, computerized FTIR equipment uses the
infrared absorption spectrum created by the chemical to identify it.
Used in industrial areas for continual monitoring, ion mobility
spectrometry and FTIR are also used extensively in Automatic Chemical
Agent Detector Alarm (ACADA) and Mobile Chemical Agent Detector (MCAD)
units used by the military. Much of this use stems from the units’
ability to be remotely deployed,
vehicle mounted, or in the case of ACADA, carried by a soldier.
As with chemical agents, the key to detecting and stopping biological
agents is the ability to sense them quickly. Unfortunately, unlike
chemical agents, which generally initiate a quick reaction, biological
agents usually have an incubation period. During this period, symptoms
may not appear, but the agent is still capable of being transferred.
Unlike chemical agents, the effectiveness of a system to sense
biological agents is also very hard, if not impossible, to completely
test. One other characteristic of biological agents is the medium in
which they can be delivered. Biological agents can be dispersed in a
liquid, solid, or gas state, making the use of one type of sensor very
difficult. Presently, most systems are designed to identify bio-agents
in the air. These include handheld, portable units, as well as large,
long-range units mounted on helicopters, that are designed to span an
area of approximately 50 kilometers. These units, unlike some of the
chemical sensing units discussed above, do not necessarily identify the
particular biological agent, but rather look for the typical signs
associated with a line source agent released by aerosol. The key here is
to not necessarily identify which bio-agent it is, but to sense the
release of one, giving personnel sufficient time to seek protective
gear.
It has been estimated by the U.S. Government Accounting System that
between 2007 and 2017, the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office will spend
approximately $3.1 billion on equipment designed to detect radiation at
major U.S. ports. This amount does not include equipment installed at
major international ports, including the February 2010 completion of
radiation detection systems at Colon Container Terminal and the Port of
Cristobal in Panama, and the Port of Manzanillo, Mexico. This also does
not include maintaining and protecting the 436 existing nuclear power
plants in 30 countries that are currently operational, or the 55
reactors currently under construction. Preventing terrorists from
transporting radioactive materials across borders, as well as
safeguarding current nuclear power plants from terrorist attacks, is a
huge proposition.
Many have claimed that security at nuclear power plants is currently
insufficient, just as many have claimed that there are countries engaged
in non-civilian nuclear activities. How do you increase security as well
as monitor the activity of materials necessary to create a nuclear
agent? In the case of both existing and future nuclear power plants,
continual inspection and detection are still the best answer.
Currently detection at most sea ports and major land border crossings is
performed using radiation portal monitors in conjunction with handheld
radioisotope identifiers. Unfortunately, this method of detection has
been shown to produce a significant number of false positives, which
then require individual secondary inspection, which creates delays and
employs costly manpower. To overcome these shortfalls, in 2004 work
began on a new radiation detection system called advanced spectroscopic
portals (ASPs). Designed to replace existing radiation portal monitors,
these ASPs use a suite of radiation sensors that use spectroscopy to
detect and identify the radioactive source. Comprised of a variety of
sensor cameras, an environmental control system, portal control system,
UPS, radiation sensor panels, break beams, and an external annunciator,
the first ASPs are currently installed and undergoing extensive testing.
Other types of radiation detectors that use spectroscopy include
handheld units for both ground and aerial vehicles.
Although
the types of connectors used in CBRN equipment vary greatly, many of the
connectors are standard military circular, rectangular, and PCB types.
In applications where interconnects are exposed to extremely harsh
conditions, such as extended temperatures or in areas of potentially
high exposure to nuclear or radioactive agents, special precautions must
be taken.
Murtaza Fidaali, business development manager at ITT Interconnect, said,
“Additional features, such as sealing, will vary depending on what the
connectors are used for and if they must perform critical functions
during a failure. For instance, control rod drive cables and reactor
vent valve cables must function if there is a nuclear plant failure. In
that case, the whole interior of the plant is sprayed with a boron
solution under high pressure, with an elevated temperature. You must
show that the cables and connectors will function for 40 years, and then
will work for some number of days. The ability to function for extended
periods of time, such as 40 years (the planned life expectancy of a
nuclear power plant), also precludes the use of plastic shells. Instead,
shells used on connector applications involving potential exposure to
nuclear or radioactive materials are generally made from nuclear grade
stainless-steel.”
According to Fidaali, in addition to special shells, connectors used for
in-containment nuclear applications also require inserts, gaskets,
grommets, bushing, and o-rings made of special high-temperature,
high-radiation-resistant materials such as Viton® or flouro-silcone,
that will not degrade or become brittle over periods of exposure. Also,
"because workers are limited in the amount of radiation exposure they can
receive, ITT Interconnect products, like breakaway and bayonet-style
connectors, are desirable, because they incorporate ease-of-use with
decreased installation and de-installation time.”
Similar to connectors used for in-containment applications, connectors
and assemblies used in other CBNR applications, such as monitoring or
sensing equipment, must also meet special requirements, one of the most
important of which is sealing. Proper sealing to IP68/69K, whether mated
or unmated, not only protects the equipment from degradation due to
ingress of moisture or dirt, but also allows the connectors and
assemblies to be thoroughly cleaned (decontaminated) in case of
exposure.
In addition to IP68/69K sealing, connectors used in handheld or portable
CBNR sensing or detecting units must also be easy to use and offer
complete electromagnetic shielding. Mating must be quick and secure,
whether mated in total darkness or while wearing heavy protective gear.
In the case of detection units carried by military personnel or first
responders, the connectors must also be lightweight, yet rugged enough
to operate effectively under the most extreme environmental conditions,
including high vibration and shock. Due to the often sporadic use of
this type of equipment, connectors must also offer exceptional life
expectancy and mating cycles.
Connectors in CBRN
Applications
Connector types used in equipment designed for CBRN detection,
monitoring, and analysis come from all product types. Including:
|
▪ PCB
Connectors
PCIe
Stacking connectors
PCB receptacles and headers
FFC/FPC
▪ I/O
Rectangular Connectors
Ruggedized USB connectors
InfiniBand, Gigabit Ethernet
D-subminiatures
▪ RF
connectors
Miniature and ultra-miniature
board-to-board
connectors
Subminiature—Standard and reverse polarity
SMA
Medium—Standard and reverse polarity Type N
and TNC
▪
Circular Connectors
Ruggedized metal shell push/pull connectors
Stainless-steel self-latching connectors
Standard mil-spec approved
Application specific
▪
Fiber Optic Connectors
Single-mode
Multi-mode
EMI adaptors
▪ Power
Connectors
▪
Electrical Penetrators |
 |
Companies Involved in
CBRN Activities
There are numerous companies throughout the world that participate in
CBRN detection, monitoring, analysis, and decontamination. A sampling of
these companies is listed below:
Bertin
Technologies SA—France
Bertin Technologies
SA is a European leader in the development of equipment for detecting
and identifying biological and chemical threats for defense and homeland
security purposes. Products include ruggedized biological air samplers,
field-compact air samplers used primarily by first responders, early
warning stand-off gas cloud chemical detectors dedicated to real time
surveillance of critical areas, and field bio-identifiers used for the
identification of biological warfare agents within 10 minutes of
exposure.
Bruker Daltonics—United
States
Supplying systems for
substance detection and pathogen detection in security, defense, and
anti-terrorism, Bruker Daltronics’ field-hardened systems make use of
advanced mass and ion mobility spectrometry, as well as
Fourier
Transform Infrared Spectroscopy technologies.
Bubble
Technology—Canada
Combining scientific,
engineering, and manufacturing expertise, Bubble Technology is a
world-renowned leader in the field of radiation detection. Their
products include radiation detectors and dosimeters, radiation
spectrometers, and explosive detectors.
Environics Oy—Finland
Offering over 20
years experience in the CBNR field, Environics Oy focuses on security
solutions from early warning to consequence management. Products include
CBRN cleaning and decontamination products, chemical detection and
analysis equipment, and biological detection systems, including
buildings, airports, underground, and industrial facilities.
General Dynamics
Armament and Technical Products (GDATP)—United States
GDATP offers over 30
years experience in the development, production, and support of chemical
and biological detection systems. Their products include hand-held and
stand-off chemical agent detectors and biological agent warning sensor
systems.
Kinetics
Ltd.—Israel
Producing systems and
components for military platforms, including fighting vehicles, tactical
vehicles, mobile and stationary shelters, aircraft, and helicopters,
Kinetics Ltd. provides advanced solutions in chemical, biological,
radiation, and nuclear protection and detection.
OWR AG—Germany
OWR AG is a leading
specialist in the decontamination of personnel, equipment, and vehicles
subjected to NBC agents. Products include portable decontamination
equipment, universal decontamination systems, and multi-purpose
decontamination systems for buildings, equipment, and vehicles. OWR also
provides chemical agent detectors, point detection units for biological
warfare agents and hazards, and radiation monitoring instruments.
Pimco Sp.
Zoo—Poland
Pimco is a respected
manufacturer and supplier of equipment for detecting weapons of mass
destruction, including the detection of chemical agents, radiological
threats, and nuclear weapon detonations. Their family of products
includes chemical, nuclear, and radiological blast detector systems and
portable chemical agent detectors.
Proengin—France
One of the only
companies using flame spectrophotometry to detect biological and
chemical warfare agents, Proengin manufactures detection systems for
chemical warfare agents and toxic industrial chemicals, biological
detectors, and maintenance equipment and accessories.
Smiths
Detection—United Kingdom
A global leader in
CBNR threat detection and screening equipment for public service and
military personnel, Smiths Detection uses multiple technologies to
quickly identify a wide range of threats. Their range of products
includes biological identifiers and classifiers, vapor, solid, and
liquid chemical detection systems, and radioisotope detection and
identification equipment.
There is no doubt
that the number of products and companies involved in the sensing,
detection, and analysis of CBNR agents will continue to grow over the
next decade. This, combined with the astonishing growth in nuclear power
plants, will offer extreme harsh environment connector manufacturers
numerous new opportunities. According to ITT Interconnect’s Fidaali,
another area where “we may see significant business opportunities in the
near future is in the replacement cables and connectors. Many of the
nuclear power plants, especially in North America, are getting older and
will require replacement of existing components.”
Whether it involves providing more sophisticated sensing, detection, and
analyzing equipment, or providing new or replacement connectors and
assemblies to nuclear power plants, the world of CBNR is highly
dependent on the connector manufacturer. Their ability to supply high
quality, ruggedized connectors and assemblies to this growing market
allows even the most pessimistic of us to feel more secure.
 |
Lynda Nolen
Product Specialist, Bishop & Associates Inc.
Lynda Nolen has been in the interconnect industry for more than
30 years. She has worked in sales, sales management, marketing,
and product management for such companies as TRW Electronics
Components Group, Sunbelt Components, Cinch Connectors, Arrow
Electronics, PEI Genesis, and Delphi Interconnect. Nolen has
extensive experience in competitive cross-referencing, drawing,
web and catalog review, new product introduction programs,
harness and connector assembly programs, account management, and
customer service programs. Lynda received her bachelor of arts
degree from Roger Williams University in Rhode Island, and has
completed various electrical engineering courses.
|
|