|
Navigating the Channel:
An Overview of High-Speed Backplane Interconnects
By Brian Hauge
and Gourgen Oganessyan, Molex Incorporated
Design engineers are
continually looking to meet the demand for increased speed, bandwidth,
and port density in data communications, telecommunications, and medical
equipment applications. For example, websites such as YouTube have
created a demand for real-time video, resulting in the need for more
bandwidth to support high-quality, streaming graphics content. As voice,
video, and Internet capabilities become a novelty in wireless
applications, the need for the supporting infrastructure continues to
evolve. In the medical market, high resolution X-ray and MRI files are
shared via the Internet and surgeries are hosted on video telecasts to
enable global collaboration to enhance medical care. All of these market
drivers are challenging design engineers to deliver high-performance
solutions with more port density, while taking up less space and
consuming less power, all at lower costs.
To keep pace, backplane connector manufacturers have begun offering
innovative connector designs to support these IT infrastructure needs.
While most original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) still employ the more
traditional backplane and/or midplane architectures in their equipment,
some are employing newly emerging architectures such as orthogonal
systems, both hybrid and direct-connect (no midplane), to improve their
channel performance and lower the overall costs associated with
increasingly complex midplane designs.
Backplane Interconnect and Architecture Options
There are the traditional right-angle to vertical backplanes connectors,
orthogonal midplane connectors, direct-connect orthogonal connectors,
mezzanine connectors, and coplanar connectors. Following are some
general electrical and mechanical features and benefit guidelines for
each option.
Right Angle to Vertical Backplane Connections
Right
angle-to-vertical backplane interconnect solutions facilitate a
cross-connection between all system data points. These traditional
backplane connector products are designed for use in industry standard
rack sizes, making them a common choice in system design. Almost all
backplane connector solutions allow for blind-mating of daughtercards
into the chassis and are sequenced properly for gross alignment, keying,
power, and signal delivery. All of which allow OEMs field upgradeability
and scalability options for their systems. Most backplane connector
solutions support the many different industry standard slot widths that
allow for multiple daughtercard sizes. They also typically offer linear
signal and power scalability via end-to-end stackable monoblocks and/or
waferized systems to support the many different daughtercard
applications. Overall, these traditional solutions support a wide range
of applications, including data communications, telecommunications,
military, and medical equipment.

The Very High Density Metric (VHDM®) connector system is
designed for
applications that require increased interconnect density and high-speed
signal integrity. Standard VHDM connectors support single-ended data
rates of 2.5 Gbps with less than 5 percent crosstalk.
Primary requirements
to consider when choosing a backplane interconnect solution are
high-speed data rates (single-ended or differential), low speed
(single-ended) signals, power and gross alignment/guidance requirements,
as well as the total dimensional envelope (height, length, depth)
available for the connectors. The biggest system-level challenges are
typically space, PCB thickness/aspect ratio limitations, PCB routing
limitations, power management, and cooling/airflow. While these
solutions accommodate virtually any type of system design, higher port
densities drive the need for more signal lines routed across the
backplane. This drives a heightened potential for signal integrity
degradation, spacing issues, and layer count increases, ultimately
ending with additional costs. In turn, many connector manufacturers are
challenged with delivering high-speed, high-performance connector
solutions that occupy less space and have lower profiles to accommodate
airflow requirements at a lower cost. With material costs continually on
the rise, it is challenging for connector manufacturers to deliver
increased capabilities at a lower price, particularly with traditional
backplane interconnect solutions.

The Molex GbX® connector system is designed for leading-edge
backplane
applications that require speeds of 6 Gbps to 10 Gbps, and
provides differential pair density up to 69 pairs per inch.
Orthogonal Midplane Solutions
Orthogonal
backplane solutions are quickly emerging in a number of traditional
server, switch, and storage applications. Orthogonal midplane connector
solutions have been around since the early 1990s, primarily supporting
single-ended architectures. Now that the industry has evolved into
high-speed differential architectures, connector solutions were needed
to facilitate the transition of differential pairs from
daughtercard-to-daughtercard through the midplane, while still
maintaining the channel’s signal integrity performance.
These solutions are unique because they eliminate the need for signal
traces routed through the midplane, lowering cost, and improving signal
integrity performance. The shorter channel lengths demonstrate less
attenuation, and with the midplane via stubs removed, there is less
opportunity for energy reflections that results in lower crosstalk.
However, port density is the single largest benefit of a true orthogonal
architecture. Some of the largest, densest switches on the market today
are enabled by I-Trac orthogonal technology.
Airflow is the biggest challenge when working with orthogonal
interconnects. It can be difficult to cool a system that has
daughtercards rotated 90 degrees on one side of the midplane. One
solution is direct-connect orthogonal connectors, which completely
eliminate the midplane to further improve the system’s signal integrity
performance and airflow. Additionally, transitioning from a traditional
system to a pure orthogonal system can pose some backward compatibility
and legacy obstacles. To address both issues, products such as the ones
pictured are available to help ease this transition and provide a common
footprint.
I-Trac Backplane System from Molex is a skew-equalized, broadside
coupled
orthogonal solution that eases the transition from a traditional system
to a
pure orthogonal system by allowing use of standard header and
daughtercard
components that can be routed traditionally or orthogonally through
the midplane, allowing designers ultimate flexibility.
Coplanar
and Mezzanine Solutions
Coplanar
and mezzanine solutions are typically used for I/O expansion,
personality cards, and memory expansion cards. In most backplane product
families, these solutions feature the same mechanical and electrical
properties found in traditional backplane connectors, including common
separable interfaces, compliant pins, guidance, and power options.
In mezzanine solutions, airflow and heat sinks typically dictate the
mated connector stack heights, posing some challenges for connector
manufacturers. Due to the constantly changing thermal dynamics of
systems, different stack heights are commonly required across different
systems. Typical stack heights supported by existing high-speed
connector solutions range from 5mm to 40mm. Validating the electrical
(speed, density), mechanical (mating tolerances, guidance), and
long-term reliability (solder joints) performance of the available
connector solutions is critical. Because connector tooling flexibility
is limited in supporting a wide range of stack heights, connector
manufacturers are challenged with trying to reduce tooling costs and
design times, while still providing a compelling mezzanine interconnect
solution at competitive prices without the typical economies of scale
seen from standard, off-the-shelf backplane connector solutions.
In coplanar solutions, the internal and external I/Os used on the
daughtercards typically dictate signal performance requirements, as well
as space available for coplanar connectors. Solutions such as the I-Trac
backplane system offer an inverted RAM/RAF, allowing the two boards to
connect in either a coplanar configuration or allowing one of the two
cards to rotate 180° to adjust for the alternative I/O skylines and
airflow requirements. Most backplane connector product families offer
right-angle male options that leverage the mating interfaces; PCB
footprint/attach methodology; and mating sequences to allow electrical
and mechanical continuity across the entire system.
To ensure design engineers choose the best option for their high-speed
applications, it is important to include connector and contract
manufacturers, silicon vendors, and PCB fabricators early in the design
process. This enables everyone to work together to address every
challenge and limitation that might arise during the design process and
determine which backplane interconnect solution meets the customer’s
speed, density, cost, quality, and long-term reliability requirements.
Standardizing Channel Performance
Despite
the care taken in optimizing a connector’s electrical parameters,
system-level performance is determined by the entire channel. Printed
circuit board interface (vias or surface mount attach); chip package and
BGA attach; board traces; and DC blocking caps all influence channel
performance. This results in a need to quantify the channel behavior.
Several industry forums and standards committees have tackled this
problem, and a couple of distinct solutions are available.
The Optical Internetworking Forum’s Common Electrical Interface (CEI)
implementation agreements have chosen a methodology called StatEye (as
in statistical eye) to specify channel compliance. StatEye is a
mathematical algorithm currently implemented in Matlab that provides
probability contours for eye diagram openings corresponding to different
Bit Error Rate (BER) magnitudes. The software stimulates a given channel
and uses a specified reference transmitter (with pre- or post-emphasis)
and receiver models. If the resultant eye contours do not interfere with
a given mask, then the channel is deemed compliant. An example of a
StatEye diagram is shown below.

The IEEE 802.3 (Ethernet) working group took a different approach for
its IEEE 802.3ap 10G Backplane Ethernet standard. This standard
specifies limit lines for channel transfer functions (insertion loss),
as well as parameters including insertion loss ripple and
insertion-loss-to-crosstalk ratio (ICR). This collection of limit lines
is called the Informative Channel Model, and while it is recommended
that designers fall within the limits, this is not a formal restriction
and flexibility is allowed for tradeoffs and specifics of a given
system.
Whichever backplane design is chosen to meet ever-changing speed and
performance requirements, design engineers ultimately need to consider
what’s to come beyond current standards. To lower applied costs and
extend the system’s lifecycle, a backplane’s infrastructure needs to
have forward-compatibility that enables product use years down the road.
Brian Hauge,
new product development manager, backplane products, currently
manages global product development for high-speed backplane
interconnect solutions at Molex Incorporated. He has a Bachelor
of Science degree in business administration and industrial
engineering from the University of Nebraska and is completing
his Executive MBA from the Kellogg School of Management at
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Gourgen Oganessyan,
former senior electrical engineer at Molex Incorporated, has
worked on signal integrity aspects and design of high-speed
connector solutions, including modeling and high-speed
characterization of interconnects, as well as the design of
reference backplane architectures. He is a participant in OIF
and IEEE 802.3 industry forums. He has a master’s degree in
theoretical physics from Yerevan State University, Armenia, and
a master’s degree in applied optics from the University of North
Carolina – Charlotte.
VHDM, Very High Density Metric and GbX are trademarks or
registered trademarks of Amphenol Corporation. |